FAQs
Yes! You can visit our A/V Center.
The music in our advertising is often an original recording produced by agencies specifically for the commercial. There are also ads that feature previously released music or re-recorded versions of original compositions. We're happy to share these details if you would like to send us an email request. Be sure to include the product being advertised, as well as a detailed description of the ad.
The
At The
Request access or log in to the
Please note that access to the site is restricted to only
You can find many collectibles at
Members
of My Coke Rewards have exclusive access to a variety of limited-time,
For vintage collectibles, you may wish to consult with someone in The
We maintain information about various collectible items in the Collectors Columns section of this web site.
In addition, The
The decision to sell commemorative packaging is made by the local
If you are located outside of the U.S. and Canada, please send us an email to obtain the appropriate contact information for the
If your business is located in the U.S. or Canada and you are looking to serve
If your business is located outside of the U.S. and Canada and you need assistance with either of these items, please contact the local
In the U.S. and Canada we have a hotline dedicated to fountain services. You can call 800-241-2653 for assistance.
Businesses outside of the U.S. and Canada should contact the local
In Canada and the U.S., businesses that sell bottles and cans typically work directly with an account manager at the nearest
Businesses outside of the U.S. and Canada should contact the local
Check our collection of Company Reports. A great deal of information is also available through our Press Releases.
Many questions about our Company can be answered quickly through our question & answer tool, Ask
If you are a shareowner of The
There are also a number of books available, as well as publications like Beverage World, Beverage Digest, The Wall Street Journal, Advertising Age and AdWeek.
You also have the option of calling us at 1-800-GET COKE (438-2653) or writing us at:
The
Attn: Good Answer
P.O. Box 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
During the first year, sales of
To learn more about the history of The
My Coke
Rewards is The
The allegations are simply not true.
Two different judicial inquiries in Colombia -- one in a Colombian court and one by the Colombian attorney general -- found no evidence to support the allegations that bottler management conspired to intimidate or threaten trade unionists.
Nonetheless, these allegations were the thrust of a lawsuit filed in 2001 against The
These allegations have been investigated as well by the International Labour Organization, outside law firms and senior executives of this Company reaching the same conclusion.
The
In a country where violence against union members has deterred all but 4 percent of workers from unionizing, 28 percent of
Managing water responsibly is the highest priority in our approach to environmental policy and corporate social responsibility in India.
In 2010, we achieved our goal to be a “net positive” user of groundwater and created design potential to return an equivalent amount to what we use. We accomplished this through rainwater harvesting, drip irrigation and other initiatives.
We have about 400 Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) projects in place across 20 states in India. We now have created the potential to do even more – we have the potential to return nearly 120 percent of the groundwater we use (considering a base of the amount of
groundwater used in 2011).
We have been a winner of several prestigious awards on community development and corporate social responsibility. We have either been a winner or been recognized by the judges for our CSR work every year since 2008.
While we know we have more to do to continue to build a truly water sustainable business in India, we are proud of our progress to date.
No. The
We rely on third-party experts and research organizations to test the safety of the ingredients and packaging we use for our beverages.
We encourage our ingredient and packaging suppliers and independent research organizations to use alternatives to animal testing whenever such testing is available and sufficient for demonstrating safety. Some governmental agencies require and identify specific animal tests to verify the safety of some ingredients and additives.
We also financially support research to develop alternative methods to animal testing.
On October 25,
The closures we use on bottles are 100 percent recyclable from a technical standpoint and highly recycled. They are made from high-density materials selected for their compatibility with most recycling systems. Most recyclers use a float/sink process where PET bottles sink and the closures and labels float. For this reason, and to minimize litter, we recommend that consumers recycle their beverage bottles by putting the cap back on before placing in a recycle bin. Like the PET plastic used in our bottles, there also are end markets for the material used in the caps, such as paint pails and battery casings.
The decision to produce a beverage option is based on many considerations. While we may not produce a caffeine-free or diet version of every product, we do offer several caffeine-free and diet (typically labeled as diet, light or zero) choices.
Please take a look at our complete brand list. If the product you seek is listed and you reside in the U.S. or Canada, you can visit our bottler finder to find out if it is distributed in your neighborhood.
If you are located outside of the U.S. and Canada, please send us an email to obtain the appropriate contact information for the
For many of our brands, the nutritional information varies from one country to another. For products in the U.S., you can review nutritional information on our website. For products in other countries, please send us an email and we will reply with the requested information.
Aspartame is one of the most thoroughly studied food ingredients, with more than 200 scientific studies confirming its safety. In 1983, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aspartame for use in carbonated beverages. In addition to the FDA, regulatory agencies in more than 100 countries have found aspartame to be safe. Aspartame does contain the amino acid phenylalanine, and, therefore, should not be consumed by people with phenylketonuria, a rare genetic condition for which infants are tested at birth in the U.S., as well as in many other countries. More information about aspartame and other sweeteners »
The
The
All of our products, regardless of the type of packaging used, are safe.
Independent scientists have thoroughly reviewed the data and have assured us that our beverage cans pose no public health risk. Our own scientists also have reviewed the data and are confident about our packaging safety. In addition, the scientific body of evidence has been reviewed independently by several government regulators throughout the world. These regulators have repeatedly stated that current levels of exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) through beverage packaging pose no health risk to the general population, including children.
Aluminum can liners that use BPA are the industry standard and have been used safely for more than 50 years. In fact, they have improved food and beverage safety by providing protection against food-borne diseases.
A number of studies and reviews conducted in 2010 and 2011, including one study lauded by a leading endocrinologist as being "majestically scientific and cautious," support the prevailing evidence that BPA is safe for humans. Learn more about these studies.
Our top priority is to ensure the safety and quality of our products and packaging through rigorous standards that meet or exceed government requirements. If we had any concerns about the safety of our packaging, we would not use it.
No. Neither high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in sparkling beverages nor any other single food or beverage is responsible for the problems of obesity or diabetes. A study conducted by the American Medical Association concluded that HFCS does not appear to contribute any more to obesity than other caloric sweeteners.
Our beverage portfolio includes many different types of sweeteners. Sweetener use depends on the product as well as consumer preferences. HFCS is used as a sweetener in foods and beverages in the United States because it tastes like sucrose, is easy to use in the food manufacturing process, and has historically cost substantially less than cane or beet sugar (more commonly used as sweeteners in other parts of the world). HFCS is used to sweeten most sparkling beverages in the United States. It provides numerous consumer benefits, such as sweetness, shelf stability and pourability.
All our products and ingredients are safe for human consumption and comply with the regulatory requirements of the country in which a product is sold. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved HFCS as a safe ingredient for use in food and beverages.
Obesity is one of the world's leading public health concerns, and we have an important role to play in addressing this complex issue. We care about people's health, both physical and emotional, and we seek to understand people's individual needs for enjoyment, refreshment, nutrition and hydration. We want to help empower people around the world to develop active, healthy lifestyles through our commitments, our actions and our dedication of resources to three guiding principles: Think, Drink and Move (see pages 24-26 of our
Global estimates on the number of overweight and obese people continue to rise (currently reported as high as 1.7 billion, which is equal to one quarter of the world's population). Reports of adverse health consequences and negative societal and economic impacts continue to be discussed. Policy recommendations and regulatory requirements are being set in place to reverse the situation.
Together with other stakeholders, we are committed to a number of initiatives that can help combat obesity, including:
Learn more about our position on obesity, our commitments and key health and well-being facts. Download (PDF updated quarterly).
No. In fact, low-calorie sweeteners such as aspartame, saccharin and sucralose provide sweetness with almost no calories, which makes them a useful tool for weight management. More than 200 scientific studies confirm the safety of aspartame as a sweetener. In addition to U.S. FDA approval, regulatory agencies in more than 100 countries approve aspartame's safety. In an extensive 2006 review of its safety by the European Food Safety Authority, aspartame was again demonstrated and reaffirmed to be safe.
The U.S. FDA, as well as other government agencies, has determined saccharin to be a safe non-nutritive sweetener. In 1999, the U.S. FDA approved sucralose as a "general purpose" sweetener. Sucralose has also been approved for use in more than 40 countries, including Australia, Canada and Mexico.
Yes. Our policy on nanotechnology is as follows:
Recognizing and appreciating the trust that consumers place in us every time they reach for one of our beverages, The
We use only those ingredients and materials that have been evaluated for safety based on sound science and that have been approved for use by local health and safety regulators. Wherever we operate, we abide by the laws and customs of the local communities, including regulations pertaining to health, safety and product labeling.
The
As consumer safety is paramount to our Company, we will take whatever steps necessary, based on sound scientific principles, to ensure any new technology is safe for consumers and the environment, has the requisite local regulatory authorization for permitted use and meets local community preference.
The
Please visit the FAQs section on the My Coke Rewards web site for answers to questions about this program. For
specific inquiries about current offers and promotions, click here for
onsite Virtual Agent, Facebook/Twitter or Consumer Care support.
This is most likely a fraudulent email and an ongoing issue that we address in the Rumors section of our web site. Please visit this section for more information and to view samples of several hoax emails.
No. Emails and links to web sites asking the question, "Which do you prefer? Coke or Pepsi," are originating from several different sources and circulating on the Internet. The emails and web sites ask that participants fill out surveys regarding product preferences. The communications promise product, cash or other prizes in return for providing personal information while participating in the surveys. Unfortunately, these are examples of the types of solicitation schemes that have plagued the Internet. The
No. Unfortunately, this is one of the many email hoaxes that have plagued the Internet. The
The
Industry and Consumer Affairs
The
DUN 500
P.O. Box 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
We ask that you allow 4-6 weeks for review and follow up. If you have questions or comments in the meantime, please feel free to contact us.
NOTE: If your proposal is for a media or interactive opportunity, please visit our Vendor Proposal Submission site at
The
Before any part of the system sponsors events or attractions that feature animals, the event organizers and/or attraction management must have policies and procedures in place to support the humane treatment of animals and provide ready access to quality veterinary care to protect animal health and safety. This requirement must be included in the system's sponsorship contracts for events and attractions featuring animals.
The Company's trademarks must not be used to promote an event or an attraction that violates local, state or national laws or is contrary to the Company's policy and guidelines.
At a Special Meeting of Shareowners held on July 10, 2012, the shareowners of The
View supplemental financial information reflecting the two-for-one stock split (PDF).
The information on this page is intended to answer questions you may have about the two-for-one stock split and amendment to our restated certificate of incorporation. None of the answers should be considered tax or investment advice. You should consult your tax or investment professionals for detailed advice that takes into account your specific circumstances.
What is a two-for-one stock split?
When did the Board of Directors approve the two-for-one stock split and amendment to the restated certificate of incorporation?
Why did the Board of Directors recommend a two-for-one stock split?
Why did the Board of Directors recommend doubling the authorized shares of common stock?
What does a two-for-one stock split mean to shareowners of The
How many times has the Company split its stock?
When will the stock split and the amendment to the certificate of incorporation be effective?
Will the stock split change my percentage ownership of The
What happens if I sell my shares of stock after the record date and before the payment date (distribution date)?
How will the split affect quarterly dividends on common stock?
Is the stock split a taxable transaction?
What should I do with my existing stock certificate(s) of The
Will I receive a new stock certificate for my additional shares?
How will additional shares from the split be distributed to shareowners?
What is Direct Registration?
Why did the Company choose to distribute the shares through DRS?
Are there any fees associated with DRS?
How do I convert my stock certificates to DRS?
If I prefer to hold my shares in certificate form, how do I request a certificate?
Who do I contact if I have additional questions about my shares?
In a two-for-one stock split, shareowners as of the record date of the stock split receive one additional share of common stock for each share he or she owns.
On April 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to Article FOURTH of the Company's restated certificate of incorporation to (i) increase the number of shares of common stock which the Company is authorized to issue from 5,600,000,000, par value $.25 per share, to 11,200,000,000, par value $.25 per share, and (ii) effect a two-for-one stock split of the common stock of the Company. The Board determined that such amendment is advisable and directed that the proposed amendment be submitted for approval by shareowners at a Special Meeting of Shareowners, which was held on July 10, 2012. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company was required to approve the proposed amendment.
back to top
The two-for-one stock split reflects the Board of Directors' continued confidence in the long-term growth and financial performance of our Company. Our system's 2020 Vision to double our revenues over this decade provides a clear roadmap for creating value for our consumers, customers, bottling partners and shareowners. The two-for-one stock split reflects our desire to share value with an ever-growing number of people and organizations around the world. The Board of Directors anticipates that the increase in the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company resulting from the stock split will place the market price of the common stock in a range more attractive to investors, particularly individuals, which may result in a broader market for our stock.
back to top
The two-for-one stock split will be the 11 th split of the common stock since its listing in 1919. The history of stock splits by record date is as follows:
| September 5, 1919 | Stock listed on NYSE |
| April 25, 1927 | 1-for-1 stock dividend |
| November 15, 1935 | 4-for-1 stock split |
| January 22, 1960 | 3-for-1 stock split |
| January 22, 1965 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| May 13, 1968 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| May 9, 1977 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| June 16, 1986 | 3-for-1 stock split |
| May 1, 1990 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| May 1, 1992 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| May 1, 1996 | 2-for-1 stock split |
| July 27, 2012 | 2-for-1 stock split |
The key dates to be aware of are as follows:
No, the stock split will not change your proportionate interest in the Company.
back to top
The Board of Directors declared the first and second quarterly 2012 regular dividend of 51 cents per share payable on April 1, 2012 and July 1, 2012 respectively, equivalent to an annual dividend of $2.04 per share.
The Board of Directors has declared the third quarterly 2012 regular dividend of 25.5 cents per common share, which is payable October 1, 2012, to shareowners of record as of September 15, 2012. This is the first dividend payable following the stock split. The amount of the dividend was adjusted as a result of the stock split and is equivalent to the 51 cents per share regular quarterly dividends declared in the first two quarters of 2012 prior to the split.
The Board has not yet determined the fourth quarterly cash dividends for 2012.
back to top
The Company has been advised by tax counsel that the stock split would not result in recognition of gain, loss or other taxable income by owners of common stock under existing U.S. Federal income tax laws. The cost basis for tax purposes of each new share and each retained share of common stock will be equal to one-half of the cost basis for tax purposes of the corresponding share immediately preceding the stock split. In addition, the holding period for the additional shares issued pursuant to the stock split would be deemed to be the same as the holding period for the original shares of common stock. Shareowners who are subject to the tax laws of other jurisdictions are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding any tax consequences of the stock split under such laws.
Although this tax information is provided for your assistance, we are not providing personal tax advice. You should consult your personal tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of any transaction you undertake with these shares.
back to top
Your existing common stock certificates are still valid. The stock certificates you personally hold continue to represent the same number of shares as shown on their face and should be kept in a safe place such as a safety deposit box, as they are valuable documents. However, today most shares are kept in paperless fashion and shareowners have the option to conveniently convert all valid certificates to Direct Registration.
back to top
The Direct Registration form of ownership allows registered shareowners to maintain their shares in book-entry form without the need of a physical certificate. The shareowner retains full ownership of the shares without the responsibility of holding the actual certificate.
back to top
There are no fees to the shareowner for holdings shares in DRS. This is a free service which eliminates the worry and responsibility of keeping track of stock certificates, as well as the time and expense of replacement if certificates are lost or misplaced.
back to top
If you would like to take advantage of the convenience of having all shares held in DRS/book-entry form, you can mail your certificates to:
The
c/o Computershare
P. O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3070
If sending certificates by overnight mail:
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
It is recommended that stock certificates be mailed certified or registered mail and insured for 3 percent of the current market value. This is the cost to replace the certificates if they are lost. Do not sign your stock certificates. Include written instructions indicating you would like to deposit your stock certificate(s) into DRS/book entry form. All shareholders shown on the account must sign the written request. The certificate shares will be added to your account and an account statement will be mailed to your address of record.
back to top
The
Our scientists, and the independent scientists with whom we have consulted, have thoroughly reviewed the data and have assured us that our beverage cans pose no public health risk. In addition, government regulators around the world have reviewed the science independently and have repeatedly stated that current levels of exposure to BPA through beverage packaging pose no health risk to the general population, including children.
Our top priority is to ensure the safety and quality of our products and packaging through rigorous standards that meet or exceed government requirements. If we had any concerns about the safety of our packaging, we would not use it.
In all of our discussions with stakeholders we have been very transparent and fully disclosed non-proprietary information to assure them that our products are safe. At the same time, we also are prepared to protect our business in any eventuality. All of the information we can share at this time is available here as well as through our assessment document. We encourage our consumers, shareowners, and other stakeholders to review this information as we want them to be as confident in the safety of our products as we are. We will update this information if and when there are any significant developments.
The clear scientific consensus is that there is no risk to the public from the miniscule amounts of BPA found in
That consensus is accurately reflected in the opinions expressed by those regulatory agencies whose missions and responsibilities are to protect the public's health.
Regulatory agencies in Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, New Zealand and the United States all have conducted extensive reviews and determined that current levels of exposure to BPA through food and beverage packaging do not pose a health risk to the general population. We believe it is reasonable and appropriate to take the lead from these agencies that regulate our business.
In 2010 and 2011, in response to the highly publicized controversy, some scientific and regulatory groups decided to undertake their own reviews of the existing literature.
In addition, three new studies (described below), including one lauded by a leading endocrinologist as being "majestically scientific and cautious," support the prevailing evidence that BPA is safe for humans.
BPA is a chemical used worldwide in making thousands of materials, including some plastics, coatings, and adhesives. Virtually all metal cans used for food and beverage products are lined on the inside with a coating that uses BPA as a starting material. This coating guards against contamination and extends the shelf life of foods and beverages.
BPA is also used in the manufacture of shatter-resistant bottles, medical devices (including dental sealants), sports safety equipment and compact disc covers. It has been used for more than 50 years.
We are aware that a limited number of metal can producers are using an older generation of can lining material as an alternative for some specialty products. Such alternatives do not work for the mass production of aluminum beverage cans, and they do not work for all types of food or beverages.
No. Our bottled water and plastic soft drink containers are made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic, which does not contain BPA.
We continuously look for alternatives to improve our packaging, while maintaining its safety and quality. That's a good business practice that benefits our consumers, our shareowners and our Company. We are balancing the need to address some public perceptions of BPA with the need to be thoughtful, careful stewards of the safety, quality and performance of our products and packaging.
To that end, our chemists, toxicologists and packaging experts are working closely with a network of packaging suppliers – which includes companies that make aluminum beverage cans, companies that make liners for aluminum beverage cans and companies that adhere the linings to the cans – that are all seeking alternatives to can liners containing BPA. We also are working with leading-edge technology companies and research organizations to develop innovations in can linings.
All packaging components that come into contact with food or beverages must undergo safety assessments and stringent testing to be permitted for use by the U.S. FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities.
Any new material, assuming it has all necessary regulatory approvals, also would have to meet our requirements for safety, quality, taste and performance. We would not replace a packaging material we are confident is safe with one that is not proven or effective.
We are confident that all of our packaging is safe. We also recognize that some of our consumers and shareowners have expressed concerns and initiated campaigns to legislate alternatives to can linings containing BPA. While we do not believe such action would be based on sound science, our continuous improvement efforts in this area will help ensure we are prepared for any eventuality so that we can protect our business and our consumers' and shareowners' interests.
We respect the regulators and will abide by any decisions that they make. We trust that any actions will be based on sound science.
More information on BPA can be found on the following organizations' websites.
American Council on Science and Health
European Food Safety Authority
Grocery Manufacturers Association
Want to stay up to date on the latest happenings at The